New York Times on Darfur now: A New Year’s resolution to cover African conflicts with nuance?

Today’s New York Times features (above the fold in the non-virtual version) an article on the peace in Darfur, and at no point do they use the word genocide, talk about the conflict as a race war, or even discredit the African Union! The article actually presents the situation with nuance, only a few buzzwords, and even has interviews in which people from different perspectives admit that things are a bit different from what they feared. Could it be that the flagship of US journalism has a New Year’s resolution to turn the page on US coverage of African armed conflicts?

The conflict and refugee crisis in Darfur and neighboring Chad has become the new textbook case in the perils of humanitarian aid and refugee advocacy, influenced as it has been by a mini-industry in Western activism (e.g., Save Darfur) as well as biting criticism of these movements by academics (e.g., Mahmood Mamdani at Columbia). Anyone having anything to do with displaced populations should know all sides of these arguments in order to really understand what it is you are getting involved with when you get involved in internal conflicts. Such conflicts are anything but clear cut, anything but simple. Nuanced situations don’t play well in US media, aren’t easy to market, and certainly don’t fit Western stereotypical views of “war in Africa.” However, if the rest of the world is going to intervene in African nations’ politics and care for refugees from African conflicts, it’s high time articles such as today’s become the standard.

2 Responses to “New York Times on Darfur now: A New Year’s resolution to cover African conflicts with nuance?”

  1. 2 Sean Brooks January 6, 2010 at 11:55 pm

    A major problem with Mamdani’s book is that its terribly researched. He did not interview one person associated with Save Darfur, despite writing over a hundred pages about the organization. Equally disturbing, in evaluating what Mamdani calls Bashir’s “own little war on terror” in Darfur, he jettisons the high human rights standards to which he has held governments in his previous works.

    I encourage you to read my review, “When Killers Become Victims: Darfur in Context” at

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

January 2010
« Dec   Feb »

%d bloggers like this: