Thoughts from Charles de Gaulle

Charles de Gaulle, Paris, en route to N’Djamena, Chad. Bleary-eyed, only half-awake after a six-hour flight during which I was awaked once when my doctor colleague was called to assist in a medical emergency (they actually say, “Is there a doctor on board?” who knew?), and then again when my kosher breakfast arrived (who knew I kept kosher?). Bought a 7-Euro breakfast (a cool $9.50 for a coffee and apricot tart) to replace my quickly-revoked kosher breakfast (ultimately I don’t pass for Jewish, just like Tara Frank’s grandparents told me in 11th grade), and now we’re lying about the terminal three hours before our connecting flight to N’Djamena. Charles de Gaulle, where everything looks good but is actually made of pvc piping, saran wrap, and aluminum foil. At least we didn’t have to change terminals–on previous trips I’ve had to transfer on those busses that only go in one direction, and it’s never the direction you want them to go in. To get from terminal 2e to terminal 2d, you have to go through terminal 2f, 3, 1, 2a-c. My favorite part of the whole trip is when you get to Hassan Djamous International in N’Djamena and there’s one of those Charles de Gaulle busses waiting to take you from the plane to the one terminal–a distance of about 50 feet.

Unless you fly through South Africa, humanitarian aid travel to African countries always takes you through major European hubs: Charles de Gaulle, Heathrow, Schipol. You can find your gate by looking for the well-dressed black people sitting next to the earnest looking white people in tevas, earth-tone tee shirts, and those pants you can zip off into shorts. Africans still dress up to get on planes; Western aid workers do not. I always feel like I should do something in between. I don’t want to look like I’m going on safari, but I also can’t quite bring myself to carry around a suit and tie through 110-degree heat for the rest of the trip. Besides, dressing up for the plane reminds me of when my mother used to make me wear those 1970s plaid shirts just to go visit my grandma. Still, when the guy sitting next to me is wearing a cream-colored Van Heusen with gold cuff links, pressed gray slacks, and shiny dress shoes, I feel kind of like the jerk who showed up to the prom in blue jeans.

On perhaps a more substative note, I do think that it is important to keep humanitarian aid work (particularly the short-term type that is invovled in evaluation) within the realm of venture, not adventure. I do not mean to accuse all Western aid workers of doing this work only for the thrill of it, or that I can tell the ones who are in it for the thrill by their tevas. There is, however, an undeniable excitement to traveling to conflict zones, and even for the most dedicated humanitarian it’s very easy to get caught up in the energy of it all and lose track of the work. It’s the same sort of problem that Chris Hedges talks about in his book “War Is the Force that Gives Us Meaning,” a clear (if perhaps overstated), testimonial on the attraction that some war correspondents have to the drama of conflict. Hedges’ revelry in this feeling bothers me a little bit, but his is an important book for my field in that like war correspondents, aid workers have a tendency to enjoy the “drama of trauma” as much as enjoy the work of delivering aid. IT’s also well-articulated in “Emergency Sex and other Desperate Measures” (the title alone says enough). This attraction to conflict-affected settings and people is something to acknowlege, and then guard against so that it doesn’t get in the way of what we are supposed to be doing. I have struggled with this myself, as the excitement of travelling to new locations and learning about cultures far-removed from my everyday existence is indeed something to celebrate. But war is not, and the line that separates reveling in the opportunity to travel to a place like Chad and the reason for that opportunity is a thin and sticky one.

Humanitarian aid work is, first and foremost, work. It’s a venture, not an adventure. There’s a time for adventure–and I happen to love adventures–it’s called vacation. This is not to say you can’t have fun at your work (I happen to love fun at work), only that to be respectful of the work and the people you work with you need to acknowledge and then do your best not to get caught up in the more dramatic aspects of the work environment.

2 Responses to “Thoughts from Charles de Gaulle”

  1. 1 Jakob Lund May 3, 2009 at 9:57 am

    Looking forward to following the rest of you Venture!

  1. 1 A bad idea from the start | Eric P. Green Trackback on May 24, 2009 at 7:42 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

May 2009
« Apr   Jun »

%d bloggers like this: